Home/Supreme Court/Crow v. California Department of Human Resources Development

Crow v. California Department of Human Resources Development

420 U.S. 917, 95 S. Ct. 1110, 43 L. Ed. 2d 388, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 515
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1975
DocketNo. 73-1015
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 420 U.S. 917 (Crow v. California Department of Human Resources Development) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crow v. California Department of Human Resources Development, 420 U.S. 917, 95 S. Ct. 1110, 43 L. Ed. 2d 388, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 515 (1975).

Opinion

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded with directions to consider question of mootness in light of Sosna v. Iowa, 419 U. S. 393 (1975), and Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney, 409 U. S. 540 (1973). See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U. S. 36 (1950). If the court determines that the case is not moot, it should consider whether a three-judge court is required. See Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U. S. 528, 543-545 (1974); Fusari v. Steinberg, 419 U. S. 379 (1975); cf. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. Epstein, 370 U. S. 713, 716 (1962). Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Walker v. Itasca County Auditor
624 N.W.2d 599 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 2001)
Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission v. County of Hennepin
451 N.W.2d 319 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1990)
Lund v. County of Hennepin
403 N.W.2d 617 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1987)
United States Steel Corp. v. State
324 N.W.2d 638 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)
McCannel v. County of Hennepin
301 N.W.2d 910 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1980)
American Federation of Labor v. Employment Development Department
88 Cal. App. 3d 811 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Lifteau v. Metropolitan Sports Facilities Commission
270 N.W.2d 749 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1978)
Neeland v. Clearwater Memorial Hospital
257 N.W.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)
Joseph Stone, Intervening v. Paul Philbrook, Individually and as Commissioner of the Vermont Department of Social Welfare
528 F.2d 1084 (Second Circuit, 1975)
Echevarria v. Carey
402 F. Supp. 183 (S.D. New York, 1975)
Claudia Frost v. Caspar Weinberger, as Secretary of United States Department of Health,education and Welfare
515 F.2d 57 (Second Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 U.S. 917, 95 S. Ct. 1110, 43 L. Ed. 2d 388, 1975 U.S. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crow-v-california-department-of-human-resources-development-scotus-1975.