Crounse Corporation v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America

Sixth Circuit

Crounse Corporation v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America

787 F.2d 1031

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1986

Docket84-3743 to 84-3753, 84-3842 and 84-3868

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 787 F.2d 1031 (Crounse Corporation v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crounse Corporation v. The Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, 787 F.2d 1031 (6th Cir. 1986).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

The Court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this Court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissents from denial of petition for rehearing en banc, in which KEITH, MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges, joined. JONES, Circuit Judge, delivered a separate dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court having received a petition for rehearing en banc, and the petition having been circulated not only to the original panel members but also to all other active judges of this Court, and less than a majority of the judges having favored the suggestion, the petition for rehearing has been referred to the original hearing panel.

The panel has further reviewed the petition for rehearing and concludes that the issues raised in the petition were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, the petition is denied.

MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissents from denial of petition for rehearing en banc, in which KEITH, MARTIN and JONES, Circuit Judges, joined. JONES, Circuit Judge, delivered a separate dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

787 F.2d 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crounse-corporation-v-the-interstate-commerce-commission-and-the-united-ca6-1986.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack