Crossman v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Crossman v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 248, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4158

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedJanuary 26, 1928

DocketDocket Nos. 7052, 19619.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 B.T.A. 248 (Crossman v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crossman v. Commissioner, 10 B.T.A. 248, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4158 (bta 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

[250]*250OPINION.

Siefkin :

The question involved in this case is one of law which has been determined adversely to the respondent’s contention in L. F. Sunlin, 6 B. T. A. 1232. The complete and able brief filed in this proceeding by counsel for petitioner confirms our belief that our decision in the Sunlin case was correct. It follows that the respondent’s action was erroneous.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[250]*250OPINION.

Siefkin :

The question involved in this case is one of law which has been determined adversely to the respondent’s contention in L. F. Sunlin, 6 B. T. A. 1232. The complete and able brief filed in this proceeding by counsel for petitioner confirms our belief that our decision in the Sunlin case was correct. It follows that the respondent’s action was erroneous.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 B.T.A. 248, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crossman-v-commissioner-bta-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack