Crossman v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Crossman v. Commissioner

10 B.T.A. 248, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4158

United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided January 26, 1928·No. Docket Nos. 7052, 19619.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[250] OPINION.

Siefkin :

The question involved in this case is one of law which has been determined adversely to the respondent’s contention in L. F. Sunlin, 6 B. T. A. 1232. The complete and able brief filed in this proceeding by counsel for petitioner confirms our belief that our decision in the Sunlin case was correct. It follows that the respondent’s action was erroneous.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[250] OPINION.

Siefkin :

The question involved in this case is one of law which has been determined adversely to the respondent’s contention in L. F. Sunlin, 6 B. T. A. 1232. The complete and able brief filed in this proceeding by counsel for petitioner confirms our belief that our decision in the Sunlin case was correct. It follows that the respondent’s action was erroneous.

Judgment will be entered on 15 days’ notice, under Rule 50.

Crossman v. Commissioner, 10 B.T.A. 248, 1928 BTA LEXIS 4158 (bta 1928).

Pincite

10 B.T.A. 248 (Crossman v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related