Home/Supreme Court/CROSS Et Al. v. BRUNING Et Al.

CROSS Et Al. v. BRUNING Et Al.

379 U.S. 202
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 14, 1964
Docket436, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 U.S. 202 (CROSS Et Al. v. BRUNING Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CROSS Et Al. v. BRUNING Et Al., 379 U.S. 202 (1964).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nancy Jewell Cross v. John A. Bruning, County Clerk of San Mateo County, California
413 F.2d 678 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 202, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cross-et-al-v-bruning-et-al-scotus-1964.