Crosland v. Brickell

97 So. 286, 86 Fla. 91
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 20, 1923·No. Case No. 1·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

This appeal is from, an interlocutory •order overruling a_ general demurrer to a bill of complaint. 'The .bill contains allegations upon which evidence may be adduced to warrant appropriate equitable relief by due course of procedure. No error is made to appear.

Where an. appeal is taken from an interlocutory order •overruling a general demurer to a bill, of complaint in an •equity cause and it appears to the court that the allegations of the bill sufficiently state an equity for appropriate relief, the interlocutory order appealed from may be affirmed by the court without discussing dn an opinion the several contentions made on the appeal.

Affirmed.

Taylor, C. J., and-Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crosland v. Brickell, 97 So. 286, 86 Fla. 91 (Fla. 1923).

97 So. 286 (Crosland v. Brickell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith Bros. Construction Co. v. Hart
126 So. 373 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Hillsborough County v. Jeffords
126 So. 373 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Cummings Investment Corp. v. Horton
124 So. 428 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Tripp v. Flory
124 So. 468 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1929)
Crosland v. Brickell
97 So. 286 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1923)