Cronin v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.
This text of 96 F. Supp. 608 (Cronin v. Petterson Lighterage & Towing Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a motion by defendant for an order pursuant to Rule 56(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., granting summary judgment to the defendant in its favor, and dismissing the complaint herein.
A reading of all of the papers convinces me that in the final analysis the true nature of plaintiff’s employment is a question of fact to be passed upon at the trial. Where there is any doubt as to an issue of fact, as is clearly indicated in the papers on this motion, summary judgment should not be granted. Arnstein v. Porter, 2 Cir., 154 F.2d 464, 471, 474.
The motion is, accordingly, denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 F. Supp. 608, 1950 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cronin-v-petterson-lighterage-towing-corp-nysd-1950.