Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cromartie v. State

Cromartie v. State

939 So. 2d 1137, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16921, 2006 WL 2873384
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cromartie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9106 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 11, 2006·No. No. 1D06-4673·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DENIED. See Waterhouse v. State, 792 So.2d 1176, 1193 (Fla.2001) (stating that ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel is not a cognizable claim).

ALLEN, BENTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cromartie v. State, 939 So. 2d 1137, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 16921, 2006 WL 2873384 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

939 So. 2d 1137 (Cromartie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Waterhouse v. State
792 So. 2d 1176 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2001)