Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cromartie v. State

Cromartie v. State

910 So. 2d 882, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13276, 2005 WL 2006967
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 23, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-3061
StatusPublished

This text of 910 So. 2d 882 (Cromartie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cromartie v. State, 910 So. 2d 882, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13276, 2005 WL 2006967 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because petitioner’s alleged harm can be adequately remedied on appeal, see, e.g., Lee v. State, 847 So.2d 1142 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

ALLEN, LEWIS and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lee v. State
847 So. 2d 1142 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
910 So. 2d 882, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 13276, 2005 WL 2006967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromartie-v-state-fladistctapp-2005.