Cromartie v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cromartie v. State

692 So. 2d 1007, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4918, 1997 WL 228570

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cromartie v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11494 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 7, 1997·No. No. 97-860·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a demal of Ms motion to correct an illegal sentence for second degree murder, armed robbery, and armed Mdnapping. We affirm.

As the trial court properly found, the defendant was a principal in an armed Md-napping and was therefore subject to an enhanced sentence for armed Mdnapping pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1987), as a life felony. Furthermore, the defendant had entered into a plea agreement with the State; the plea colloquy demonstrates that the plea was Miow-ingly and voluntarily entered.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from a demal of Ms motion to correct an illegal sentence for second degree murder, armed robbery, and armed Mdnapping. We affirm.

As the trial court properly found, the defendant was a principal in an armed Md-napping and was therefore subject to an enhanced sentence for armed Mdnapping pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1987), as a life felony. Furthermore, the defendant had entered into a plea agreement with the State; the plea colloquy demonstrates that the plea was Miow-ingly and voluntarily entered.

AFFIRMED.

Cromartie v. State, 692 So. 2d 1007, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4918, 1997 WL 228570 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

692 So. 2d 1007 (Cromartie v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.