Cromartie v. State
This text of 692 So. 2d 1007 (Cromartie v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant appeals from a demal of Ms motion to correct an illegal sentence for second degree murder, armed robbery, and armed Mdnapping. We affirm.
As the trial court properly found, the defendant was a principal in an armed Md-napping and was therefore subject to an enhanced sentence for armed Mdnapping pursuant to section 775.087, Florida Statutes (1987), as a life felony. Furthermore, the defendant had entered into a plea agreement with the State; the plea colloquy demonstrates that the plea was Miow-ingly and voluntarily entered.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
692 So. 2d 1007, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 4918, 1997 WL 228570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cromartie-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.