Croll v. Yanes
257 A.D. 919, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8396
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We are of the opinion that the verdict was not for an inadequate amount when the testimony as to the expenses, offered by the defendant, is given fuff consideration. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is inadequate.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Croll v. Yanes, 257 A.D. 919, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
257 A.D. 919 (Croll v. Yanes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.