Croll v. Yanes
257 A.D. 918, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395
Opinion
— -Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: While the verdict in this case is small, we are unable to say from the evidence that it is inadequate. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is inadequate.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Croll v. Yanes, 257 A.D. 918, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).
257 A.D. 918 (Croll v. Yanes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.