Croll v. Yanes
This text of 257 A.D. 919 (Croll v. Yanes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We are of the opinion that the verdict was not for an inadequate amount when the testimony as to the expenses, offered by the defendant, is given fuff consideration. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict is inadequate.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 919, 12 N.Y.S.2d 1011, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croll-v-yanes-nyappdiv-1939.