Croisdale v. Weed

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Croisdale v. Weed

139 A.D.3d 1365, 29 N.Y.S.3d 838

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2016

DocketAppeal No. 2

StatusPublished

This text of 139 A.D.3d 1365 (Croisdale v. Weed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Croisdale v. Weed, 139 A.D.3d 1365, 29 N.Y.S.3d 838 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, A.J.), entered June 18, 2015. The order denied the motion of defendants for leave to renew their motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Croisdale v Weed ([appeal No. 1] 139 AD3d 1363 [2016]).

Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Curran and Troutman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, A.J.), entered June 18, 2015. The order denied the motion of defendants for leave to renew their motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Croisdale v Weed ([appeal No. 1] 139 AD3d 1363 [2016]).

Present — Smith, J.P., Carni, Lindley, Curran and Troutman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 A.D.3d 1365, 29 N.Y.S.3d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/croisdale-v-weed-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack