CROISDALE, SANDRA J. v. WEED, ROBERT R.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

CROISDALE, SANDRA J. v. WEED, ROBERT R.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 6, 2016

DocketCA 15-01480

StatusPublished

This text of CROISDALE, SANDRA J. v. WEED, ROBERT R. (CROISDALE, SANDRA J. v. WEED, ROBERT R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CROISDALE, SANDRA J. v. WEED, ROBERT R., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

329 CA 15-01480 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

SANDRA J. CROISDALE AND LAWRENCE CROISDALE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ROBERT R. WEED AND LYOLA B. WEED, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HAGELIN KENT LLC, BUFFALO (SEAN SPENCER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

GRECO TRAPP, PLLC, BUFFALO (DUANE D. SCHOONMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Matthew J. Murphy, III, A.J.), entered June 18, 2015. The order denied the motion of defendants for leave to renew their motion for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Croisdale v Weed ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [May 6, 2016]).

Entered: May 6, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI