Crockwell v. Austin
This text of Crockwell v. Austin (Crockwell v. Austin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ERIN CROCKWELL,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-1649 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, plaintiff’s
Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 27, the memoranda submitted in
support and opposition thereto, the Joint Appendix of Relevant Portions of the Certified
Administrative Record, ECF No. 31, and the entire record herein, for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby:
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, is DENIED;
and it is further
ORDERED that plaintiff’s Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No.
27, is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that this matter be remanded to the Physical Disability Board of Review for
further consideration consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion; and it is further
ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.
1 SO ORDERED.
This is a final and appealable order.
Date: March 28, 2024
__________________________ BERYL A. HOWELL United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crockwell v. Austin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crockwell-v-austin-dcd-2024.