Crockwell v. Austin
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ERIN CROCKWELL,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 22-1649 (BAH)
v.
Judge Beryl A. Howell
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III in his official capacity as United States Secretary of Defense, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
Upon consideration of defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, plaintiff’s Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 27, the memoranda submitted in support and opposition thereto, the Joint Appendix of Relevant Portions of the Certified Administrative Record, ECF No. 31, and the entire record herein, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby:
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 21, is DENIED;
and it is further ORDERED that plaintiff’s Corrected Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No.
27, is GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that this matter be remanded to the Physical Disability Board of Review for further consideration consistent with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion; and it is further ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.
SO ORDERED. This is a final and appealable order. Date: March 28, 2024
BERYL A. HOWELL
United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crockwell v. Austin (Crockwell v. Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.