Criscuolo v. Brandow

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------------x ANTHONY CRISCUOLO, : : Petitioner, : 23-CV-02406 (JPC) (OTW) : -against- : ORDER : STEPHEN G. BRANDOW, : Respondent. : : : --------------------------------------------------------------x ONA T. WANG, United States Magistrate Judge: The Court is in receipt of Petitioner’s motion to seal and Respondent’s letter response. (ECF Nos. 11 and 15). ECF 11 is GRANTED. The Court is also in receipt of Petitioner’s motion to disqualify counsel. (ECF Nos. 22-24). Petitioner, who is represented by counsel, filed this motion pro se. See ECF 25 at 1 n.1. ECF 22 is DENIED. See United States v. Hage, 74 F.4th 90, 93 (2d Cir. 2023) (holding that a defendant has “no right to ‘hybrid’ representation in which he is represented by counsel but supplements his lawyer’s work with selected pro se submissions.”) (citation omitted). ECF Nos. 9 and 18 are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF Nos. 9, 11, 18, and 22.

SO ORDERED.

s/ Ona T. Wang Dated: October 18, 2023 Ona T. Wang New York, New York United States Magistrate Judge