Crews v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crews v. State

477 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2505, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17501

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 8, 1985

DocketNo. 85-314

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 477 So. 2d 1093 (Crews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crews v. State, 477 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2505, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17501 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment for grand theft. On appeal, the parties offer differing calculations of the presumptive range under the guidelines, but under either interpretation the sentence constituted a departure. Because the record lacks a written statement delineating the reasons for departure, we reverse appellant’s sentence. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). On remand for resentencing, we assume that the parties will express their positions with respect to scoring so that the judge will be able to determine the proper range. Should the judge once again decide to depart, the reasons for departure must be stated in writing. Any party aggrieved by the new sentence may file a new appeal. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

SCHEB and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

Appellant was sentenced to five years imprisonment for grand theft. On appeal, the parties offer differing calculations of the presumptive range under the guidelines, but under either interpretation the sentence constituted a departure. Because the record lacks a written statement delineating the reasons for departure, we reverse appellant’s sentence. State v. Jackson, 478 So.2d 1054 (Fla.1985). On remand for resentencing, we assume that the parties will express their positions with respect to scoring so that the judge will be able to determine the proper range. Should the judge once again decide to depart, the reasons for departure must be stated in writing. Any party aggrieved by the new sentence may file a new appeal. The judgment is otherwise affirmed.

SCHEB and SCHOONOVER, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

477 So. 2d 1093, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2505, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 17501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crews-v-state-fladistctapp-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack