Crews v. State

456 So. 2d 959, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2061, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15235
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 27, 1984·No. No. 83-1424·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

The trial court erred in retaining jurisdiction for one-half of appellant’s sentences because, at time of sentencing, the statute permitted retention of jurisdiction for a maximum period of one-third of any sentence. Section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983). The State’s contention that the absence of objection below to the sentence makes the issue non-applicable has previously been answered to the contrary. Brumley v. State, 455 So.2d 1096 (Fla.1984).

Those portions of the sentences which retain jurisdiction for one-half of each sen[960]*960tence are set aside, and the cause is remanded so that the trial court may amend such sentences by retaining jurisdiction for a period not to exceed one-third of each sentence.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crews v. State, 456 So. 2d 959, 9 Fla. L. Weekly 2061, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 15235 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

456 So. 2d 959 (Crews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larson v. State
572 So. 2d 1368 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1991)
Joyce v. State
466 So. 2d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1985)