Creswell Trading Co. v. United States

Court of International Trade

Creswell Trading Co. v. United States

4 F. Supp. 2d 1264

CourtUnited States Court of International Trade

DecidedJune 24, 1998

DocketSlip Op. 98-87; Court. No. 91-01-00012

StatusPublished

This text of 4 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (Creswell Trading Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Creswell Trading Co. v. United States, 4 F. Supp. 2d 1264 (cit 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

DiCARLO, Senior Judge.

In accordance with the decision (April 16, 1998) and mandate (June 8, 1998) of the [1265]*1265United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Appeal Nos. 97-1486 and 97-1487, affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part this court’s decision in Creswell Trading Co. v. United States, 21 CIT ——, 964 F.Supp. 409 (1997) [hereinafter Creswell V], it is hereby

ORDERED that the portion of this court’s opinion and order in Creswell V holding that oceanic shipping costs did not constitute countervailable subsidies is vacated, and it is further

ORDERED that Commerce shall recalculate the countervailing subsidy conferred and issue new final results consistent with the opinion of the appellate court. . Remand results are due within thirty days of the date this order is entered. It is further

ORDERED that any party contesting the results shall file comments or responses within thirty days of the remand results, after which Commerce will have fifteen days in which to file a reply.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI