Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United States

24 F. Supp. 2d 318, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 957, 22 C.I.T. 957, 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2054, 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143
CourtUnited States Court of International Trade
DecidedSeptember 29, 1998
DocketSlip Op. 98-139. Court No. 91-01-00012
StatusPublished

This text of 24 F. Supp. 2d 318 (Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of International Trade primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creswell Trading Co., Inc. South Bay Foundry 1989 v. United States, 24 F. Supp. 2d 318, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 957, 22 C.I.T. 957, 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2054, 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143 (cit 1998).

Opinion

JUDGMENT ORDER

DICARLO, Senior District Judge.

The United States Department of Commerce has submitted its Results of Redetermination in accordance with this Court’s Remand order of June 24, 1998 in the case of Creswell Trading Co., et al. v. United States, 4 F.Supp.2d 1264, Consol. Court No. 91—01—00012, Slip Op. 98-87. In its Redetermina *319 tion of the 1985 administrative review, Commerce recalculated the company-specific and country-wide subsidy rates to reflect ocean shipping costs. The new rates applicable to the 1985 period of review are as follows:

Carnation Enterprise Pvt. Ltd. 13.83%

Crescent Foundry Co. Pvt. Ltd. 30.09%

Govind Steel 51.39%

Kejriwal Iron & Steel Works 14.09%

R.B. Agarwalla & Co. 7.96%

R.S.I. 8.22%

Serampore Industries Pvt. Ltd. 22.09%

UMA Iron & Steel Co. 15.64%

Kajaria Castings Ltd. 44.84%

Super Castings (India) 29.40%

Country-wide Rate 22.09%

The Court having reviewed the Redetermi-nation Results, and Commerce having complied with the Court’s Remand, and no comr ments having been received by any party within the time limit set by the Remand Order, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Redetermination Re-suits are affirmed; and it is further

ORDERED that, as all other issues have been decided, this action is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Creswell Trading Co. v. United States
22 Ct. Int'l Trade 612 (Court of International Trade, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 F. Supp. 2d 318, 22 Ct. Int'l Trade 957, 22 C.I.T. 957, 20 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 2054, 1998 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creswell-trading-co-inc-south-bay-foundry-1989-v-united-states-cit-1998.