Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co. v. Hayes

6 P. 445, 2 Cal. Unrep. 458
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1885
DocketNo. 8522
StatusPublished

This text of 6 P. 445 (Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co. v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co. v. Hayes, 6 P. 445, 2 Cal. Unrep. 458 (Cal. 1885).

Opinion

By the COURT.

Appeal from an order refusing to dissolve an injunction. The original complaint filed in this cause, and on which alone the court ordered an injunction to issue, did not state facts sufficient to warrant the court in granting the writ, and the same should have been dissolved.

Orders reversed and cause remanded, with directions to grant the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 P. 445, 2 Cal. Unrep. 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crescent-city-mill-transportation-co-v-hayes-cal-1885.