Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co. v. Hayes
11 P. 319, 2 Cal. Unrep. 657
This text of 11 P. 319 (Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co. v. Hayes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crescent City Mill & Transportation Co. v. Hayes, 11 P. 319, 2 Cal. Unrep. 657 (Cal. 1886).
Opinion
The amended answer filed in this cause raised.issues entitling defendant to a trial upon the merits. The order sustaining plaintiff’s demurrer to the amended answer was therefore erroneous.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with directions to the court below to overrule the demurrer.
Thornton, J., dissenting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Deck v. District Court
207 P. 1004 (Montana Supreme Court, 1922)
Batchoff v. Butte Pacific Copper Co.
198 P. 132 (Montana Supreme Court, 1921)
Motel Oxmon v. Modern Woodmen of America
145 N.W. 171 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
11 P. 319, 2 Cal. Unrep. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crescent-city-mill-transportation-co-v-hayes-cal-1886.