Creel v. Piedmont Natural Gas Company
118 S.E.2d 761, 254 N.C. 324, 38 P.U.R.3d 415, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 407
Opinion
The question whether a preliminary mandatory injunction should be issued, rests in the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal “unless contrary to some rule of equity, or the result of improvident exercise of judicial discretion.” Whaley v. Taxi Company, 252 N.C. 586, 114 S.E. 2d 254, and cited cases.
No abuse of discretion is made to appear in this cause.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Creel v. Piedmont Natural Gas Company, 118 S.E.2d 761, 254 N.C. 324, 38 P.U.R.3d 415, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 407 (N.C. 1961).
118 S.E.2d 761 (Creel v. Piedmont Natural Gas Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Huggins v. Wake County Board of Education
157 S.E.2d 703 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1967)