Creel v. Piedmont Natural Gas Company
This text of 118 S.E.2d 761 (Creel v. Piedmont Natural Gas Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The question whether a preliminary mandatory injunction should be issued, rests in the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal “unless contrary to some rule of equity, or the result of improvident exercise of judicial discretion.” Whaley v. Taxi Company, 252 N.C. 586, 114 S.E. 2d 254, and cited cases.
No abuse of discretion is made to appear in this cause.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 S.E.2d 761, 254 N.C. 324, 38 P.U.R.3d 415, 1961 N.C. LEXIS 407, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creel-v-piedmont-natural-gas-company-nc-1961.