Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Crawford v. State

Crawford v. State

798 So. 2d 10, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13138, 2001 WL 1093066
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 19, 2001·No. No. 1D00-4340·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Any alleged error in the state’s written Notice of Intent to seek an enhanced sentence is harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. See Lewis v. State, 636 So.2d 154, 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (failure to satisfy [11]*11written notice requirements is subject to harmless error analysis).

AFFIRMED.

MINER, LEWIS and POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crawford v. State, 798 So. 2d 10, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 13138, 2001 WL 1093066 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

798 So. 2d 10 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Petro Harvester Oil & Gas Co., LLC, Petro Harvester Operating Company, LLC, Comstock Oil & Gas, LP, Jerry Huddleston, Gary McAdams, Champion Oilfield Service, LLC, Boots Smith Oilfield Services, LLC, Rockall Energy, LLC and Deepwell Energy Services, LLC v. Tay Baucum and Deidra Baucum
Mississippi Supreme Court, 2021