Crawford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crawford v. State

785 So. 2d 666, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6173, 2001 WL 484559

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 9, 2001

DocketNo. 3D00-3349

StatusPublished

This text of 785 So. 2d 666 (Crawford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. State, 785 So. 2d 666, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 6173, 2001 WL 484559 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brian Keith Crawford appeals an order revoking his probation. It is clear that defendant-appellant Crawford failed to report for a number of months and failed to pay costs of supervision in the amount of $25 per month. The revocation is affirmed on that basis.

The record appears to be clear that the defendant did not have the ability to pay the court costs and restitution amount. [667]*667See § 948.06(5), Fla. Stat. (2000); Word v. State, 533 So.2d 893 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We therefore strike those findings of the trial court.

Given the trial court’s remarks at sentencing, it is quite clear that striking two of the grounds for revocation would have made no difference in the sentence imposed. That being so, there is no need for resentencing.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI