Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Crawford v. State

Crawford v. State

555 So. 2d 956, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 386, 1990 WL 4109
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Crawford v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2367 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 24, 1990·No. No. 89-0833·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of conviction but reverse for resentencing. The state concedes that the guidelines scoresheet improperly included a factor for the dismissed Count II in its computation. Additionally, the state concedes that the trial court erroneously considered the permissive guideline range effective after the date of the offense which may not be applied retroactively.

DOWNEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crawford v. State, 555 So. 2d 956, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 386, 1990 WL 4109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

555 So. 2d 956 (Crawford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.