Crawford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crawford v. State

555 So. 2d 956, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 386, 1990 WL 4109

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 24, 1990

DocketNo. 89-0833

StatusPublished

This text of 555 So. 2d 956 (Crawford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crawford v. State, 555 So. 2d 956, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 386, 1990 WL 4109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of conviction but reverse for resentencing. The state concedes that the guidelines scoresheet improperly included a factor for the dismissed Count II in its computation. Additionally, the state concedes that the trial court erroneously considered the permissive guideline range effective after the date of the offense which may not be applied retroactively.

DOWNEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the judgment of conviction but reverse for resentencing. The state concedes that the guidelines scoresheet improperly included a factor for the dismissed Count II in its computation. Additionally, the state concedes that the trial court erroneously considered the permissive guideline range effective after the date of the offense which may not be applied retroactively.

DOWNEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 So. 2d 956, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 386, 1990 WL 4109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.