Crawford v. Smith

Fourth Circuit

Crawford v. Smith

187 F. App'x 328

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 3, 2006·No. No. 06-6647, 06-6650·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Smith, No. 2:03-cv-00884-RBS-FB; Crawford v. Simons, No. 2:04-cv-307 (E.D.Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We deny Crawford’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), in which he sought reconsideration of the court’s order denying his motion to reopen his civil action. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Smith, No. 2:03-cv-00884-RBS-FB; Crawford v. Simons, No. 2:04-cv-307 (E.D.Va. Mar. 30, 2006). We deny Crawford’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Crawford v. Smith, 187 F. App'x 328 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

187 F. App'x 328 (Crawford v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.