Crawford v. Smith

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6759

CURTIS E. CRAWFORD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ROMAINE SMITH, Correctional Officer; JOHN DOE, Inmate,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-03-884)

Submitted: June 10, 2004 Decided: June 21, 2004

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Curtis E. Crawford, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Curtis E. Crawford appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to reinstate an action filed pursuant to

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403

U.S. 388 (1971), and the Federal Tort Claims Act. He also appeals

the district court’s denial of his motion filed under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. See Crawford v. Smith,

No. CA-03-884 (E.D. Va. Apr. 23, 2004; Apr. 30, 2004). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -