Crawford v. City of Detroit
This text of 389 F.2d 1001 (Crawford v. City of Detroit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Having received and considered appel-lees’ motion to dismiss or affirm, and having reviewed and considered the briefs and appendices, including the opinion of the District Judge in the above-styled appeal,
The court hereby affirms the judgment of the District Court in accordance with Rule 18(5) (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, as amended December 12, 1967,1 it being manifest that no substantial federal question is presented.
See Readey v. St. Louis County Water Co., 352 S.W.2d 622 (Mo.1961), appeal dismissed and cert. denied, 371 U.S. 8, 83 S.Ct. 20, 9 L.Ed.2d 47 (1962); Kraus v. City of Cleveland, 163 Ohio St. 559, 127 N.E.2d 609 (1955), appeal dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 351 U.S. 935, 76 S.Ct. 833, 100 L.Ed. 1463 (1956); Chapman v. City of Shreveport, 225 La. 859, 74 So.2d 142, appeal [1002]*1002dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 348 U.S. 892, 75 S.Ct. 216, 99 L.Ed. 701 (1954).
Entered by order of the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 F.2d 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crawford-v-city-of-detroit-ca6-1968.