Craig v. Lininger
61 Pa. Super. 339, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 11, 1915·No. Appeal, No. 88·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Opinion by
The defendant, while district attorney, unlawfully received the money claimed in this action, and now seeks to retain it through a technicality that is entirely without legal merit. The opinion filed by the court below so fully disposed of the defense interposed, that it is needless to pursue the argument further.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craig v. Lininger, 61 Pa. Super. 339, 1915 Pa. Super. LEXIS 329 (Pa. Ct. App. 1915).
61 Pa. Super. 339 (Craig v. Lininger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McGrath Attorney General v. Dravo Corporation
183 F.2d 709 (Third Circuit, 1950)
National Surety Corp. v. Nulton
55 Pa. D. & C. 149 (Beaver County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
In Re: Appeal of Sykesville Borough
91 Pa. Super. 335 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1927)