Cox v. State
779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1856, 2001 WL 167019
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. No. 4D01-79·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The order summarily denying Appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to his filing a timely sworn motion for postconviction relief challenging the voluntary and intelligent character of his plea. See Mortimer v. State, 770 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cox v. State, 779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1856, 2001 WL 167019 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
779 So. 2d 601 (Cox v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cox v. State
805 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)