Cox v. State

779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1856, 2001 WL 167019
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 2001
DocketNo. 4D01-79
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 779 So. 2d 601 (Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. State, 779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1856, 2001 WL 167019 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order summarily denying Appellant’s motion to correct illegal sentence is affirmed, without prejudice to his filing a timely sworn motion for postconviction relief challenging the voluntary and intelligent character of his plea. See Mortimer v. State, 770 So.2d 743 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

STONE, STEVENSON and SHAHOOD, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cox v. State
805 So. 2d 1042 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 601, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1856, 2001 WL 167019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.