Cox v. Curwen

118 Mass. 198, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 336
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedSeptember 3, 1875
StatusPublished
Cited by19 cases

This text of 118 Mass. 198 (Cox v. Curwen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cox v. Curwen, 118 Mass. 198, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 336 (Mass. 1875).

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

The property in question was the property of Henry Barr, and was conveyed by him by the indenture of 1832 to John Russell in trust to retain and hold it during the lifetime of Barr, to convert the real estate into personalty, to render accounts to him annually, to pay to him from time to time the income, and, if necessary, part of the principal, at the discretion of the trustee, for the benefit of Barr and his daughter, and after his death to transfer all the estate then remaining to his “ legal representatives.”

It is admitted that the ordinary meaning of the words “ legal representatives ” is “ executors and administrators ; ” and we are of opinion that there is nothing in the terms of this indenture to induce the court to attribute to the settlor an intention that they should have any other meaning, or afford any rule for the distribution of the estate after his death, or affect his right to dispose of it by will. Upon his death, therefore, it was the duty of the trustee to convey the property to his executor to be distributed according to his will. Smith v. Barneby, 2 Collyer, 728. In re Crawford's Trusts, 2 Drewry, 230. Alger v. Parrott, L. R. 3 Eq. 328. Mackenzie v. Mackenzie, 3 Macn. & Gord. 559. In re Best's Trusts, L. R. 18 Eq. 686. Bill dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McMahan v. Greenwood
108 S.W.3d 467 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Wilbur
728 N.E.2d 264 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 2000)
Garfield v. White
92 N.E.2d 575 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1950)
Commissioner of Corporations & Taxation v. Second National Bank
30 N.E.2d 889 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1941)
Shiya v. Erickson
156 Misc. 738 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1935)
Brownv. Boston & Maine Railroad
186 N.E. 59 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1933)
Lewis v. King
141 S.E. 909 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1928)
Hunt v. Remsberg
112 P. 590 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1911)
Alexander v. McPeck
75 N.E. 88 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Kelsay v. Eaton
76 P. 770 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Sullivan v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
138 Ala. 650 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1903)
Briggs v. Walker
171 U.S. 466 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Ewing v. Shannahan
20 S.W. 1065 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1892)
Ralston v. Sharon
51 F. 702 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1892)
Ewing v. Jones
15 L.R.A. 75 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Lodge v. Weld
2 N.E. 95 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)
Thompson v. United States
20 Ct. Cl. 276 (Court of Claims, 1885)
Worcester v. Kelley
119 Mass. 575 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1876)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 Mass. 198, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cox-v-curwen-mass-1875.