Cox v. Commissioner

41 T.C. 161, 1963 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 26
United States Tax Court·Decided November 7, 1963·No. Docket No. 1913-62·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

OPINION

Withey, Judge:

A deficiency in the income tax of petitioners for the taxable year 1960 has been determined by the respondent in the amount of $33.

The only issue to be decided is whether tolls paid by petitioner Donald L. Cox for the use of a turnpike are deductible as taxes under section 164(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954.

The entire record is the stipulation of facts of the parties which we adopt as our findings of fact.

The petitioners, Donald L. Cox and Mollie M. Cox, filed their Federal income tax return for the calendar year 1960 with the district director of internal revenue, Denver, Colo.

During the entire year 1960 the petitioners resided in Boulder, Colo., and petitioner Donald L. Cox commuted from Boulder to his permanent place of employment with Peter Kiewit Sons Co. in Denver, Colo.

During the year 1960, Donald L. Cox, in connection with his commuting from his residence to his permanent place of employment, used the Boulder-Denver Turnpike and paid the sum of $150 in tolls charged by the turnpike for the privilege of traveling along and over it.

The Boulder-Denver Turnpike is a concrete four-lane road which is 16.8 miles in length from its place of commencement on Base Line Road, Boulder, to its point of termination on Federal Boulevard near Denver. This turnpike affords an access between Boulder and Denver which is 8.2 miles shorter than any other highway between these two cities. All highways between these two cities, with the exception of the turnpike, are two-lane roads.

The Boulder-Denver Turnpike ivas created pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes Annotated (1953), chapter 120, article 8, as amended. The relevant sections of this article which were in existence during the year 1960 are as follows:

120-8-2. Powers granted to department. — In addition to the powers now possessed by it, the department of highways shall have power:
[[Image here]]
(2) To construct, operate, maintain, improve and reconstruct turnpikes in the unincorporated territory in the state and to acquire, construct, operate, control and use said turnpikes and all works, facilities and means necessary or convenient to the full exercise of the powers herein granted. It is hereby declared and determined that such turnpikes will be public highways of the state.
sfe * * * * * £
(4) To establish and collect fees, fares and tolls for the privilege of traveling along and over said turnpikes and for such other uses as may be made available by the establishment of such turnpikes, to adopt such rules and regulations governing the use of said turnpikes as the department of highways may determine to be advisable and to exercise such other powers and authority as may be necessary or convenient to the practical and full operation and use thereof.
(5) To set aside in a special sinking fund and to pledge any and all fees, fares and tolls and all income howsoever derived to the payment of the principal of and the interest on the bonds hereinafter authorized to be issued.
120-8-8. Bonds authorized. — (1) For the purpose of defraying the cost of construction, improving or reconstructing any such turnpike and all expenses incidental thereto, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, all engineering and legal fees and interest during construction and for one year thereafter, the department of highways may, upon the affirmative majority vote of the entire membership of the state highway commission and the affirmative vote of the governor, issue bonds of the state of Colorado, payable from a fund consisting of the fees, fares and tolls derived from any designated turnpike project and, with the approval of the general assembly evidenced by joint resolution of the senate and house of representatives, additionally secured by a pledge of and payable from a special fund set aside from the state highway fund, provided, that the amount so set aside and pledged shall not exceed in any one year one hundred per cent of the total of the following:
(2) The amount of principal and interest falling due during such year, and
(3) The amount required to be paid into the special sinking fund as a reasonable reserve for the payment of the bonds hereinafter authorized in accordance with the resolution of the department of highways authorizing their issuance as approved by the joint resolution of the senate and house of representatives.
120-8-4. Bond details. — All bonds issued under the provisions of this article shall bear interest at a rate or rates not exceeding an effective rate of three per cent per annum on the face value thereof and shall be in such form and executed in such manner and shall be payable at such times extending not more than thirty years from the date thereof, shall contain such provisions for prior redemption and shall be payable at such places as the department of highways shall determine. * * * Such bonds shall contain on their face the designation of the project as determined upon by the department of highways and in anticipation of the revenues of which the same are issued. * * *
120-8-6. Payment of bonds. — (1) (a) At or before the issuance of any such bonds, the department of highways shall by resolution establish a schedule of fees, fares and tolls to be charged for the use of the project, and shall also by said resolution create a special sinking fund in the state treasury for the payment of the principal of and the interest on said bonds authorized to be issued, promptly as the same, respectively, become due. Into said fund there shall be set aside and pledged by the department of highways all said fees, fares and tolls and all other income howsoever derived resulting from the operation of the project, and all moneys authorized to be set aside and pledged from the state highway fund not exceeding in any one year one hundred per cent of the total of the following:
(b) The amount of principal and interest falling due during such year, and
(c) The amount required to be paid into the special sinking fund as a reasonable reserve for the payment of the bonds hereinafter authorized in accordance with the resolution of the department of highways authorizing their issuance as approved by the joint resolution of the senate and house of representatives.
* * * * * * *

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cox v. Commissioner, 41 T.C. 161, 1963 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 26 (tax 1963).

41 T.C. 161 (Cox v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Principal Life Insurance v. United States
70 Fed. Cl. 144 (Federal Claims, 2006)
Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner
104 T.C. No. 12 (U.S. Tax Court, 1995)
Collins v. Commissioner
1984 T.C. Memo. 104 (U.S. Tax Court, 1984)
Sims v. Commissioner
72 T.C. 996 (U.S. Tax Court, 1979)
Trujillo v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 670 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
Dean v. Commissioner
1976 T.C. Memo. 379 (U.S. Tax Court, 1976)
Dubitzky v. Commissioner
60 T.C. No. 4 (U.S. Tax Court, 1973)
Cox v. Commissioner
41 T.C. 161 (U.S. Tax Court, 1963)