Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Cowart v. State

Cowart v. State

137 S.E. 575, 36 Ga. App. 601, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cowart v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 Ga. App. 122 →
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 8, 1927·No. 17822·Published

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There was ample evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and his motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error. J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, J. T. Grice, solocitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowart v. State, 137 S.E. 575, 36 Ga. App. 601, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

137 S.E. 575 (Cowart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.