Cowart v. State

137 S.E. 575, 36 Ga. App. 601, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 175
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 8, 1927
Docket17822
StatusPublished

This text of 137 S.E. 575 (Cowart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cowart v. State, 137 S.E. 575, 36 Ga. App. 601, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 175 (Ga. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There was ample evidence to authorize the defendant’s conviction, and his motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur. H. H. Elders, for plaintiff in error. J. Saxton Daniel, solicitor-general, J. T. Grice, solocitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 S.E. 575, 36 Ga. App. 601, 1927 Ga. App. LEXIS 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cowart-v-state-gactapp-1927.