Cowart v. State

125 S.E. 770, 33 Ga. App. 122, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 762
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 15, 1924·No. 15741·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

1. Although in a criminal ease the accused alone can put his general character in issue, yet he can do so as effectively by his statement to the jury as by introducing sworn testimony on that subject. Barnes v. State, 24 Ga. App. 372 (3), (4). Under this ruling and the facts of the instant case, this court can not hold, as a matter of law, that the trial judge erred in ruling that the accused, by his statement to the jury, had put his general character in issue, and in permitting the State thereafter to introduce evidence as to his bad character.

2.’ The other grounds of the motion for a new trial, not being referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error, are treated as abandoned.

Judgment affirmed.

Lulce and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cowart v. State, 125 S.E. 770, 33 Ga. App. 122, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 762 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

125 S.E. 770 (Cowart v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spear v. State
179 S.E. 417 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Jackson v. State
153 S.E. 618 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Knighton v. State
150 S.E. 432 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Ward v. State
133 S.E. 749 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)
Rhodes v. State
128 S.E. 217 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)