Coward v. De Cray

California Court of Appeal

Coward v. De Cray

176 P. 57, 38 Cal. App. 783, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 320

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 27, 1918

DocketCiv. No. 2606

StatusPublished

This text of 176 P. 57 (Coward v. De Cray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Coward v. De Cray, 176 P. 57, 38 Cal. App. 783, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 320 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Pincite

Opinion

LENNON, P. J.

In this case it has been stipulated by the parties, and in accordance therewith, ordered by the court, that the appeal should be submitted to the court for decision upon the briefs and transcript filed and arguments made in an appeal involving the same parties and the same questions, numbered 2530 and entitled, Mary V. Coward, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Agnes De Cray, as Executrix, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Catherine L. Cody et al., Defendants and Respondents.

A decision in the above-entitled appeal, No. 2530, has this day been rendered and filed (ante, p. 290, [176 Pac. 56]), and for the reasons given therein, and in accordance with the stipulation and order filed herein, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., pro tern., and Beasly, J., pro tern,., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LENNON, P. J.

In this case it has been stipulated by the parties, and in accordance therewith, ordered by the court, that the appeal should be submitted to the court for decision upon the briefs and transcript filed and arguments made in an appeal involving the same parties and the same questions, numbered 2530 and entitled, Mary V. Coward, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Agnes De Cray, as Executrix, etc., et al., Defendants and Appellants; Catherine L. Cody et al., Defendants and Respondents.

A decision in the above-entitled appeal, No. 2530, has this day been rendered and filed (ante, p. 290, [176 Pac. 56]), and for the reasons given therein, and in accordance with the stipulation and order filed herein, the judgment herein is affirmed.

Sturtevant, J., pro tern., and Beasly, J., pro tern,., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 P. 57, 38 Cal. App. 783, 1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coward-v-de-cray-calctapp-1918.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack