Courtney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

59 S.E.2d 556, 81 Ga. App. 616, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 956
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 1950
Docket33049
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 59 S.E.2d 556 (Courtney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance, 59 S.E.2d 556, 81 Ga. App. 616, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 956 (Ga. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Felton, J.

1. A judgment overruling a general demurrer to a petition, unexoepted to and not vacated or set aside at the same term or at a later term upon a motion made during the term, becomes the law of the case. Where such a ruling is made and no motion is made during the term to vacate it or set it aside, and where such judgment remains in effect, it is error for the court at a subsequent term to sustain a motion to dismiss in the nature of a general demurrer and to dismiss the action. Georgia Northern Railway Co. v. Hutchins, 119 Ga. 504 (46 S. E. 659); Dye v. Alexander, 195 Ga. 676(1) (25 S. E. 2d, 419); Miraglia v. Bryson, 152 Ga. 828(2) (111 S. E. 655).

2. Admissions or statements by a party or his counsel are not proper matters for consideration in passing on a demurrer to pleadings or a motion to dismiss in the nature of a demurrer. Hicks v. Beacham, 131 Ga. 89 (62 S. E. 45), and cits.; Bowman v. Davis, 51 Ga. App. 478(6) (180 S. E. 917).

3. Since there was a judgment overruling the general demurrer to the petition, unreversed and unexcepted to, the court erred in taking into consideration the admission of counsel for the plaintiff in passing on the motion to dismiss the petition and in dismissing the action at a term subsequent to the term at which the judgment overruling the general demurrer was rendered.

The court erred in sustaining the motion to dismiss the action.

Judgment reversed.

Sutton, C.J., and Worrill, J., concur. Isaac M. Wengrow, Norris C. Broome, for plaintiff. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, James K. Rankin, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. Parks
154 S.E.2d 663 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1967)
Reeves v. South America Managers, Inc.
137 S.E.2d 700 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)
Hester v. Dixie Finance Corporation
135 S.E.2d 504 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
59 S.E.2d 556, 81 Ga. App. 616, 1950 Ga. App. LEXIS 956, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-v-state-farm-mutual-automobile-insurance-gactapp-1950.