Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State
Opinion
Order entered August 12, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00995-CR
COURTNEY EARLENE SHANNON, Appellant V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Grayson County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 2011-1-1161
ORDER
The Court has before it appellant’s motion to appoint counsel. In the motion, appellant
states that she desires to pursue the appeal, but is indigent and cannot afford counsel. She states she requested appointed counsel from the trial court, but was informed that court did not have jurisdiction. The record reflect appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial, but that counsel was not retained to represent appellant on appeal. We GRANT appellant’s motion as follows.
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is indigent and is entitled to court-appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that appellant is indigent, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel to represent appellant in this appeal.
If the trial court determines that appellant is not indigent and is not entitled to court-
appointed counsel, we ORDER the trial court to determine the name, State Bar number, and contact information for appellant’s retained counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing its written findings of fact, any orders, and any supporting documentation to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.
/s/ DAVID EVANS
JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State (Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.