Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 12, 2013
Docket05-13-00995-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State (Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

Order entered August 12, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00995-CR

COURTNEY EARLENE SHANNON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-1-1161

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s motion to appoint counsel. In the motion, appellant

states that she desires to pursue the appeal, but is indigent and cannot afford counsel. She states

she requested appointed counsel from the trial court, but was informed that court did not have

jurisdiction. The record reflect appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial, but that

counsel was not retained to represent appellant on appeal. We GRANT appellant’s motion as

follows.

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant is

indigent and is entitled to court-appointed counsel. If the trial court determines that appellant is

indigent, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel to represent appellant in this appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant is not indigent and is not entitled to court-

appointed counsel, we ORDER the trial court to determine the name, State Bar number, and

contact information for appellant’s retained counsel.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing its written findings of fact,

any orders, and any supporting documentation to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date

of this order.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal

shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Courtney Earlene Shannon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/courtney-earlene-shannon-v-state-texapp-2013.