County of Monterey v. McKee

California Supreme Court

County of Monterey v. McKee

51 Cal. 255

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1876

DocketNo. 4923

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 51 Cal. 255 (County of Monterey v. McKee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

County of Monterey v. McKee, 51 Cal. 255 (Cal. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court:

It is not necessary to decide whether the county judge had authority to hear or determine the motion to discharge the attachment, since, assuming he had jurisdiction, he determined it wrongly.

The official bond of the defendant as county treasurer was an obligation for the direct payment of money. (San Francisco v. Brader, 50 Cal. 506; Hathaway v. Davis, 83 Cal. 161.)

Order appealed from reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court:

It is not necessary to decide whether the county judge had authority to hear or determine the motion to discharge the attachment, since, assuming he had jurisdiction, he determined it wrongly.

The official bond of the defendant as county treasurer was an obligation for the direct payment of money. (San Francisco v. Brader, 50 Cal. 506; Hathaway v. Davis, 83 Cal. 161.)

Order appealed from reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

51 Cal. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/county-of-monterey-v-mckee-cal-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack