City & County of San Francisco v. Brader
50 Cal. 506
Opinion
The court below properly refused to dissolve the attachment. The bail bond sued upon was an obligation for the direct payment of money, within the meaning of that term as defined in Hathaway v. Davis, 33 Cal. 161.
Order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City & County of San Francisco v. Brader, 50 Cal. 506 (Cal. 1875).
50 Cal. 506 (City & County of San Francisco v. Brader) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tyson v. Reinecke
145 P. 153 (California Court of Appeal, 1914)
Ancient Order of Hibernians v. Sparrow
64 L.R.A. 128 (Montana Supreme Court, 1903)
County of Monterey v. McKee
51 Cal. 255 (California Supreme Court, 1876)