Countryman v. Sherman

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided October 19, 2021·No. 2:19-cv-01767·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 8 JUSTIN COUNTRYMAN, 9 Plaintiff, Case No. C19-01767-JCC-SKV 10 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND AND DIRECTING FILING 11 DAVID SHERMAN, et al., AND SERVICE OF SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 12 Defendant. 13

14 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, moves 15 for leave to amend his complaint. Dkt. 56. Plaintiff’s motion seeks to add one additional 16 Defendant (Dawn Taylor) in place of one of the previously named “John Doe” Defendants, 17 remove the remaining “John Doe” Defendants, and to add a sentence to his request for relief 18 indicating that his claims are brought “jointly and severally” against each Defendant and the 19 “actual amount of damages should be determined by the Jury after liability is shown.” Dkt. 56. 20 Defendants indicate they do not have a colorable argument in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion to 21 amend the complaint but ask for the shortest possible modification to the case scheduling order. 22 Dkt. 60. 23 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), at this point in the litigation, Plaintiff “may amend [his] 2 pleading only by leave of the court or by written consent of the adverse party; and leave shall be 3 freely given when justice so requires.” In determining whether to allow an amendment to a 4 complaint Courts consider the following factors: “the presence or absence of undue delay, bad

5 faith, dilatory motive, undue prejudice to the opposing party, and futility of the proposed 6 amendment.” Moore v. Kayport Package Express, Inc., 885 F.2d 531, 538 (9th Cir. 1989). 7 Here, Defendants indicate they do not have a basis to oppose Plaintiff’s motion to amend 8 his complaint and it does not appear the current Defendants will be prejudiced by the 9 amendment. Furthermore, Plaintiff indicates he recently became aware of the new Defendant’s 10 name. The Court finds that, under the liberal amendment standard, Plaintiff should be permitted 11 to amend his complaint under the circumstances. 12 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended 13 complaint (Dkt. 56) as set forth below and ORDERS: 14 (1) The Clerk is directed to docket Plaintiff’s proposed second amended complaint

15 (currently Dkt. 56-1) as the second amended complaint, replace “John Doe A” with Dawn 16 Taylor, as a Defendant on the docket, and terminate the remaining “John Doe” Defendants. 17 (2) Service by Clerk 18 The Clerk is directed to send the following to the existing Defendants who have 19 already appeared in this action, David Sherman (Chaplain, WSR), Belinda D. Stewart 20 (Corrections Program Manager, WSR), Bryan King (Food Services Administrator, WSR), Mark 21 Miller, (Religious Program Manager, WSR), Department of Corrections, Jack Warner 22 (Superintendent (SOU/IMU), WSR), Scott J. Russell (Deputy Director, Command A, 23 Department of Corrections), by email: a copy of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, this 1 Order, and notice of lawsuit. 2 The Clerk is directed to send the following to the newly named defendant, Dawn 3 Taylor (DOC Headquarters), by email: a copy of Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, a 4 copy of this Order, a copy of the notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons,

5 and a waiver of service of summons. 6 (3) Response Required 7 The newly named defendant, Dawn Taylor, shall have thirty (30) days within which to 8 return the enclosed waiver of service of summons. A defendant who timely returns a signed 9 waiver shall have sixty (60) days after the date designated on the notice of lawsuit to file and 10 serve an answer to the complaint or a motion permitted under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of 11 Civil Procedure. A defendant who fails to timely return a signed waiver will be personally 12 served with a summons and complaint and may be required to pay the full costs of such service, 13 pursuant to Rule 4(d)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A defendant who has been 14 personally served shall file an answer or motion permitted under Rule 12 within twenty-one (21)

15 days after service. 16 The remaining Defendants shall file amended answers, or any motions permitted under 17 Rule 12, of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, no later than December 20, 2021. 18 (4) Filing and Service by Parties Generally 19 All attorneys admitted to practice before this Court are required to file documents 20 electronically via the Court’s CM/ECF system. Counsel are directed to the Court’s website, 21 www.wawd.uscourts.gov, for a detailed description of the requirements for filing via CM/ECF. 22 Plaintiff shall file all documents electronically. All filings must indicate in the upper right-hand 23 corner the name of the magistrate judge to whom the document is directed. 1 For any party filing electronically, when the total of all pages of a filing exceeds fifty (50) 2 pages in length, a paper copy of the document (with tabs or other organizing aids as necessary) 3 shall be delivered to the Clerk’s Office for chambers. The chambers copy must be clearly marked 4 with the words “Courtesy Copy of Electronic Filing for Chambers.”

5 Any document filed with the Court must be accompanied by proof that it has been served 6 upon all parties that have entered a notice of appearance in the underlying matter. 7 Any request for court action shall be set forth in a motion, properly filed and served. 8 Pursuant to LCR 7(b), any argument being offered in support of a motion shall be submitted as a 9 part of the motion itself and not in a separate document. The motion shall include in its caption 10 (immediately below the title of the motion) a designation of the date the motion is to be noted for 11 consideration upon the Court’s motion calendar. 12 Stipulated and agreed motions, motions to file over-length motions or briefs, motions for 13 reconsideration, joint submissions pursuant to the option procedure established in LCR 37(a)(2), 14 motions for default, requests for the clerk to enter default judgment, and motions for the court to

15 enter default judgment where the opposing party has not appeared shall be noted for consideration 16 on the day they are filed. See LCR 7(d)(1). All other non-dispositive motions shall be noted for 17 consideration no earlier than the third Friday following filing and service of the motion. See LCR 18 7(d)(3). All dispositive motions shall be noted for consideration no earlier than the fourth Friday 19 following filing and service of the motion. Id. 20 For electronic filers, all briefs and affidavits in opposition to either a dispositive or non- 21 dispositive motion shall be filed and served not later than 11:59 p.m. on the Monday immediately 22 preceding the date designated for consideration of the motion. If a party (i.e. a pro se litigant 23 1 and/or prisoner) files a paper original, that opposition must be received in the Clerk’s office by 2 4:30 p.m. on the Monday preceding the date of consideration. 3 The party making the motion may file and serve, not later than 11:59 p.m. (if filing 4 electronically) or 4:30 p.m. (if filing a paper original with the Clerk’s office) on the date designated

5 for consideration of the motion, a reply to the opposing party’s briefs and affidavits.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Countryman v. Sherman, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Countryman v. Sherman (Countryman v. Sherman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related