COUN. OF LOWER KEYS v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc.

429 So. 2d 67, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20793
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 5, 1983
Docket82-1892
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 429 So. 2d 67 (COUN. OF LOWER KEYS v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
COUN. OF LOWER KEYS v. Charley Toppino & Sons, Inc., 429 So. 2d 67, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20793 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

429 So.2d 67 (1983)

COUNCIL OF THE LOWER KEYS, Appellant,
v.
CHARLEY TOPPINO & SONS, INC., and the State of Florida, Department of Environmental Regulation, Appellees.

No. 82-1892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 5, 1983.

*68 Milledge & Hermelee and Earl G. Gallop, Miami, for appellant.

Sireci, Allen, Kelly & Muldoon and Mark Kelly, Key West, Charles G. Stephens, Tallahassee, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and DANIEL S. PEARSON and FERGUSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

We agree with the conclusions of the Department of Environmental Regulation that it is not required or authorized by Sec. 163.3194(1), Fla. Stat. (1981)[1] to deny or modify an air pollution permit, issued pursuant to Sec. 403.087, Fla. Stat. (1981) and Florida Administrative Code Rules 17-2 and 17-4, because of alleged non-compliance with local zoning ordinances, land-use restrictions or long-range development plans; and that the issuance of such a permit must be based solely on compliance with applicable pollution control standards and rules. See Sec. 403.087(4), Fla. Stat. (1981).[2] Accordingly, the final order under review is

Affirmed.

NOTES

[1] This provision states that

163.3194 — Legal status of comprehensive plan.

(1) After a comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof has been adopted in conformity with this act, all development undertaken by, and all actions taken in regard to development orders by, governmental agencies in regard to land covered by such plan or element shall be consistent with such plan or element as adopted. All land development regulations enacted or amended shall be consistent with the adopted comprehensive plan or element or portion thereof. [e.s.]

The appellant's position that an air pollution permit is a "development order" is completely belied by the definition of that term in Sec. 163.3164(5), (6), Fla. Stat. (1981).

[2] As the Department appropriately noted:

The issuance of such a permit by this Department, however, does not relieve the permittee from any duty to comply with applicable local requirements. [e.o.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Village of Key Biscayne v. Department of Environmental Protection
206 So. 3d 788 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)
Save the St. Johns River v. WATER MGT. DIST.
623 So. 2d 1193 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Gregory v. Indian River County
610 So. 2d 547 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Taylor v. Cedar Key Special Water & Sewerage District
590 So. 2d 481 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports, 1991
Manasota-88, Inc. v. Gardinier, Inc.
481 So. 2d 948 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 So. 2d 67, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20793, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coun-of-lower-keys-v-charley-toppino-sons-inc-fladistctapp-1983.