Coulson v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division
535 U.S. 933, 122 S. Ct. 1309, 152 L. Ed. 2d 219, 70 U.S.L.W. 3577, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1628
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 18, 2002
Docket01-7338
StatusPublished
Cited by35 cases
This text of 535 U.S. 933 (Coulson v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coulson v. Cockrell, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, 535 U.S. 933, 122 S. Ct. 1309, 152 L. Ed. 2d 219, 70 U.S.L.W. 3577, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1628 (2002).
Opinion
535 U.S. 933
COULSON
v.
COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION.
No. 01-7338.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 18, 2002.
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 273 F. 3d 393.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Tomlinson
340 Conn. 533 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2021)
Weathersbee v. Baltimore City Fire Department
970 F. Supp. 2d 418 (D. Maryland, 2013)
Wright v. Sandestin Investments, LLC
914 F. Supp. 2d 1273 (N.D. Florida, 2012)
Rudolph v. Buncombe County Government
846 F. Supp. 2d 461 (W.D. North Carolina, 2012)
Rock v. McHugh
819 F. Supp. 2d 456 (D. Maryland, 2011)
Donovan v. Potter
589 F. Supp. 2d 598 (E.D. North Carolina, 2008)
Rhoads v. Sommer
931 A.2d 508 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2007)
Sommer v. Rhoads
910 A.2d 514 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2006)
Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham
154 F. App'x 390 (Fourth Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Theodore John Kaczynski
416 F.3d 971 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
State v. Reddish
859 A.2d 1173 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2004)
State v. Traylor
600 S.E.2d 523 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2004)
United States v. Cruz Iniguez, AKA Cruz Iniguez Garcia, Manuel Martinez, and Cruz Garcia Iniguez, United States of America v. Cruz Iniguez, AKA Cruz Iniguez Garcia, Manuel Martinez, and Cruz Garcia Iniguez
368 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
United States v. Iniguez
368 F.3d 1113 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)
State v. Hill
597 S.E.2d 822 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2004)
United States v. Kaczynski
306 F. Supp. 2d 952 (E.D. California, 2004)
Paris v. Arc/Davidson County, Inc.
307 F. Supp. 2d 743 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)
Morris v. BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc.
302 F. Supp. 2d 515 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)
Lilly v. Mastec North America, Inc.
302 F. Supp. 2d 471 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)
Parkinson v. Anne Arundel Medical Center
79 F. App'x 602 (Fourth Circuit, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
535 U.S. 933, 122 S. Ct. 1309, 152 L. Ed. 2d 219, 70 U.S.L.W. 3577, 2002 U.S. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coulson-v-cockrell-director-texas-department-of-criminal-justice-scotus-2002.