Cottrell Co. v. United States
59 Cust. Ct. 870
Opinion
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of slitting machines and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for said slitting machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc., and The Cottrell Company et al. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 414, Abstract 69266), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cottrell Co. v. United States, 59 Cust. Ct. 870 (cusc 1967).
59 Cust. Ct. 870 (Cottrell Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
J. J. Gavin & Co. v. United States
54 Cust. Ct. 414 (U.S. Customs Court, 1965)