Cottrell Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Cottrell Co. v. United States

56 Cust. Ct. 909, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1484

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 2, 1966

DocketNo. P66/77; protests 65/757, etc. (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 56 Cust. Ct. 909 (Cottrell Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cottrell Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 909, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1484 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of slitting machines and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for said slitting machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc., and The Cottrell Company et al. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 414, Abstract 69266), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of slitting machines and parts thereof, which parts are dedicated to use on or for said slitting machines, similar in all material respects to those the subject of J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc., and The Cottrell Company et al. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 414, Abstract 69266), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 Cust. Ct. 909, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cottrell-co-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack