Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Moore

520 S.E.2d 252, 239 Ga. App. 76, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2663, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 930
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 29, 1999
DocketA99A0135
StatusPublished

This text of 520 S.E.2d 252 (Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. Moore, 520 S.E.2d 252, 239 Ga. App. 76, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2663, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 930 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Billy Joe Davis alleged in a personal injury complaint (“the underlying personal injury action”) that he was on a roof unloading shingles from a forklift when a septic tank cover under the forklift collapsed and caused him to be pulled off the roof. Davis brought suit against homeowner Cecil A. Moore and Lang Building Supply in the Superior Court of Glynn County. Soon thereafter Moore’s homeowner’s liability insurer, Cotton States Mutual Insurance Company (“Cotton States”), brought this separate declaratory judgment action, also in the Superior Court of Glynn County, to determine whether Moore is entitled to coverage and to a defense regarding Davis’ claims. The trial court denied Cotton States’ motion for summary judgment in an order entered on June 2, 1998. On July 6, 1998, the trial court amended this order by declining to enjoin the proceedings in Davis’ underlying personal injury action.

Cotton States filed a direct appeal from the trial court’s July 6, 1998 order, characterizing this order as one which “denied interlocutory injunctive relief to enjoin those proceedings in the underlying personal injury action.” However, inasmuch as both actions were filed in the same court, the order complained of is in substance the denial of a motion to stay proceedings in a related case and not the denial of injunctive relief. A direct appeal under OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (4) is not available from such an order. Grange Mut. Cas. Co. v. Riverdale Apts., L.P., 218 Ga. App. 685, 686-687 (463 SE2d 46). Accordingly, Cotton States’ appeal must be dismissed as premature.

Appeal dismissed.

Andrews and Ruffin, JJ, concur. Forbes & Bowman, Morton G. Forbes, Scot V. Pool, for appellant. James A. Yancey, Jr., for appellee. Cecil A. Moore, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. Riverdale Apartments, Ltd. Partnership
463 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
520 S.E.2d 252, 239 Ga. App. 76, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2663, 1999 Ga. App. LEXIS 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cotton-states-mutual-insurance-v-moore-gactapp-1999.