Cotter v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.
76 N.E. 910, 190 Mass. 302, 1906 Mass. LEXIS 1071
Opinion
The former judgment was for the same cause of action as that now sued on. It was rendered on the merits and is a bar not only on all the issues actually tried, but on all which might have been tried in it. Foye v. Patch, 132 Mass. 105. Bassett v. Connecticut River Railroad, 150 Mass. 178. Bradley v. Bradley, 160 Mass. 258. Watts v. Watts, 160 Mass. 464, 465. Harlow v. Bartlett, 170 Mass. 584, 591. Clare v. New York New England Railroad, 172 Mass. 211. Butrick, petitioner, 185 Mass. 107.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cotter v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co., 76 N.E. 910, 190 Mass. 302, 1906 Mass. LEXIS 1071 (Mass. 1906).
76 N.E. 910 (Cotter v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
David Manning, Jr. v. Ross Grimsley and the Baltimore Baseball Club, Inc.
643 F.2d 20 (First Circuit, 1981)
Town on Boylston v. McGrath
204 N.E.2d 906 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1965)
Vasu v. Kohlers, Inc.
61 N.E.2d 707 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1945)
Mackintosh v. Chambers
285 Mass. 594 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1934)
E. C. Bowman & Son Co. v. Hern
131 N.E. 334 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Romana v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
116 N.E. 218 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1917)
Capaccio v. Merrill
110 N.E. 626 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1915)
Marvel v. Cobb
219 Mass. 458 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Rogers v. Shea
106 N.E. 1018 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Mazzariello v. Doherty
204 F. 245 (First Circuit, 1913)
Institution for Savings in Newburyport & Its Vicinity v. Puffer
87 N.E. 562 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1909)
Richstein v. Welch
83 N.E. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)