Cothorn v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary

155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided November 23, 1959·No. P. C. No. 25·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The applicant was convicted under three separate indictments of three separate offenses—robbery, unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, and assault. None of the individual sentences exceeded the maximum authorized by law. Separate offenses may be punished separately. Williams v. State, 205 Md. 470, 109 A. 2d 89. A disparity between the sentence imposed upon the applicant and that imposed upon his co-defendant affords no basis for relief under the Post Conviction Procedure Act.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cothorn v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary, 155 A.2d 652, 221 Md. 581 (Md. 1959).

155 A.2d 652 (Cothorn v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cothorn v. Warden
155 A.2d 652 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Davis v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
201 A.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1964)
Proctor v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
177 A.2d 404 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1962)
Ellinger v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
167 A.2d 334 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)